Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tribal Settlement Reform topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sponsor urges pause; judiciary committee tables tribal-claims bills to secure full tribal input

Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary · March 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sen. Rachel Talbert Ross asked the committee to delay working through amended language on LD785 (and LD395) until all affected tribal nations could confirm support; the committee voted unanimously to table both bills to ensure sovereign nations' voices are represented.

Senator Rachel Talbert Ross, sponsor of LD785, asked the Judiciary Committee to postpone formal action on amended language to allow all affected tribal nations to weigh in, saying she had not been included in some discussions and that sovereign nations must have equal opportunity to voice positions.

"I have not been involved in conversations that led to this language today," Senator Talbert Ross said, urging the committee not to act without confirmation from each tribal leadership that would be impacted. She noted several tribal chiefs were not present and that some had been in Washington, D.C., for other business.

Committee chairs and members debated whether to hold a nonvoting work session to level-set members on the newly proposed amendment language or to delay work entirely until tribal leadership could participate. Several members stressed respect for tribal sovereignty and cautioned against using committee time to debate amendment language that might not reflect consensus among all tribes.

After discussion and a brief recess, Senator Talbert Ross moved to table LD395 and LD785; Representative Aaron Dana seconded the motion. The committee voted by show of hands, and the chairs announced the motion passed unanimously. Both bills were tabled to permit further consultation with tribal nations and to schedule a subsequent work session when full tribal representation could be secured.

Committee members emphasized their intent to respect sovereign decision-making and to return to the bills only after confirming tribal consensus or sufficient representation for deliberation.