Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Marine Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects bill requiring turtle‑restrictor devices on recreational crab traps
Summary
After heated debate about scope and enforcement, the Virginia Senate rejected House Bill 1013, which would have required recreational crabbers to use plastic restrictors on crab pots to reduce drowning of diamondback terrapins. Opponents warned the language could extend to non‑tidal waters and create legal triggers affecting commercial fisheries.
The Virginia Senate narrowly rejected House Bill 1013 on March 11, 2026, after a floor debate that split lawmakers over conservation goals and regulatory reach.
Supporters of the measure, which would require recreational crabbers to install turtle‑restrictor devices on crab traps, said the devices are a modest, targeted way to prevent terrapin drownings without burdening commercial fishers. "We're losing turtles," the senator arguing for the substitute told colleagues, adding the change affects recreational crabbers and is grounded in presentations from scientists who, he said, found restrictors rarely exclude crabs.
Opponents countered that the bill, as amended, applied statewide — including non‑tidal streams and headwaters — and could unintentionally impose criminal penalties on ordinary recreational harvesters. "This bill is actually worse than it was yesterday," the senator from King George said, arguing the language no longer limited protections to specially designated areas and could require restrictors "in the Cowpasture River" or other inland waters. He warned that a statutory mandate could lead to litigation forcing application to commercial pots, a result he said would harm the commercial seafood industry.
The floor featured repeated exchanges about the bill’s geographic scope and who would enforce the requirement. Questioners pressed whether recreational crabbers commonly fish above tidal waters and whether the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) should, instead, be directed to address by regulation. Supporters said the bill aimed to send a clear signal and cut known terrapin mortality from recreational gear.
The final roll call recorded 18 ayes and 22 noes; the motion to pass the bill therefore failed.
What happens next: Committee sponsors and opponents indicated they will continue discussions, with several senators urging further work in committee to narrow geographic scope, clarify VMRC’s role, and remove criminal penalties or provide exemptions for small-scale, noncommercial crabbers.
Votes and formal actions
- Motion: passage of House Bill 1013 (terrapin restrictor requirement). Tally: Ayes 18, Noes 22 — Outcome: failed.
Key quotes
- "Either you want to eat crabs or you want to save all the turtles," Senator from King George said in floor debate, summarizing his view of the trade‑offs at stake. - "We're losing turtles," the sponsor said in explaining the policy rationale for restricting devices on recreational pots.
Speakers (first reference shown)
- Senator from King George (Lawmaker) — first referenced SEG 1036 - Senator from Fairfax (Lawmaker) — first referenced SEG 955 - Senator from Charlottesville (Lawmaker) — first referenced SEG 481 - Senator from Isle of Wight (Lawmaker; introduced Pastor Anthony Robinette earlier in the day) — first referenced SEG 122
Authorities cited in debate
- Marine Resources Commission (agency) — referenced by senators as the body with existing fisheries authority
Clarifying details
- Bill target: recreational crabbers only (sponsor’s floor explanation). - Penalty: senators raised that violation could be a misdemeanor under the bill as written (concern flagged on the floor). - Vote: 18 ayes, 22 noes (failed).
Provenance
- topicintro: SEG 955 - topfinish: SEG 1428
