Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Handbook topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews updated discipline matrix, student‑handbook changes; approves updated procedures
Summary
Administrators presented handbook and discipline‑matrix revisions — including explicit entries for threats/arson, hazing and extortion, new guidance on dress code and tobacco counseling — and the board voted to approve the updated 2026–27 procedures.
Get email alerts on the Handbook topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District administrators and parent representatives presented a consolidated discipline matrix and proposed handbook changes for the 2026–27 school year. The packet covers school‑by‑school edits and districtwide policy clarifications intended to increase consistency among building administrators.
Key changes reviewed included:
- New or clarified entries for serious threats and arson, including protocols for threat assessment and responses. administrators said they added specific guidance after recent incidents and OSD audit recommendations.
- Hazing and extortion: district staff proposed explicit language elevating extortion and hazing to offenses that allow escalated discipline depending on severity.
- Tobacco and substance use: the matrix will pair disciplinary steps with mandatory counseling and available cessation programs rather than discipline only; tobacco incidents will include counseling referrals.
- Dress code: clarifications such as "no visible undergarments" and a recommended minimum strap width were added to provide consistent enforcement guidance across campuses.
- Academic integrity and technology: the secondary handbook includes an academic‑fraud entry that addresses use of AI tools; the policy differentiates grade levels (K–2 vs. 3–5; secondary distinctions) and retains administrator discretion for extenuating circumstances.
- High‑school rules and operations: items discussed include limiting food deliveries to lunch, clarifying prom guest eligibility, limiting senior release for students in credit recovery, a two‑week limit on accepting late work (with exceptions for documented medical or approved activities), and tying six tardies in a grading period to loss of off‑campus privileges.
Administrators emphasized that the matrix provides a recommended range for discipline (progressive steps from in‑school interventions to out‑of‑school suspension) and that principals retain discretion to increase or decrease consequences based on severity and context. Parents who participated in handbook meetings were credited with raising concerns that shaped several edits.
After discussion the board moved to approve the updated procedures and handbooks for 2026–27; the motion passed on a voice vote.
Next steps: District staff will embed the approved discipline matrix in each school handbook, publish the handbooks on school and district websites and conduct classroom and parent assemblies to communicate changes before the start of school.

