Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Opioid Recovery topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Haskell County signs opioid-abatement contracts with 633 Recovery; commissioner abstains on housing contract

Haskell County Commissioners · March 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Haskell County commissioners approved a funding agreement and related contract with 633 Recovery Incorporated to support opioid-recovery housing, approved a multi-year grant application, and recorded an abstention on the housing contract because one commissioner sits on the provider's board.

Haskell County commissioners voted to authorize opioid-abatement funding and approve a related county contract with 633 Recovery Incorporated on motions presented at the meeting.

The board signed Resolution 312622, authorizing an opioid-abatement funding agreement between Haskell County and 633 Recovery Incorporated with funding to expire June 30, 2026. Kane, a representative of 633 Recovery Incorporated, told the board the provider is currently housing 10 people from Haskell County—nine men and one woman—and that funds will flow directly to the third-party provider rather than through the county.

The board also reviewed and signed a county contract with 633 Recovery Incorporated for opioid-recovery housing that runs through June 30, 2026. Committee member Clark McClary voted yes; Committee member Larry Watson voted yes; Committee member Billy Cloud recorded an abstention and stated the abstention was because he sits on the provider's board of directors.

Commissioners then approved Resolution 312623, a separate authorization to submit an opioid-abatement grant application and implement funded projects for fiscal years '26 through '29. At the meeting a projected funding total of $225,000 for the next three years was mentioned by staff.

The county clerk/meeting staff confirmed that legal review had been completed through the attorney general's office for the agreements and contracts presented. The motions to approve these items carried at the meeting; the contract vote included the single abstention noted above.

Next steps noted in the meeting: the county will finalize contract paperwork and proceed with grant application filings under Resolution 312623; staff indicated a potential first draw of funds could occur as early as December of the current year if the grant is approved.