Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Solicitor flags recent court rulings and a pending U.S. Supreme Court decision that could affect county ballot rules
Summary
The commission’s solicitor reviewed a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on cast-vote-record production via Right-to-Know, a broader Voting Rights Act decision at the U.S. Supreme Court, and ongoing litigation about undated or misdated ballot envelopes in the Third Circuit that may reach the U.S. Supreme Court.
The commission’s solicitor briefed members on several recent and pending court developments that could have downstream effects on Northampton County election practice.
The solicitor summarized a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision about the Voting Rights Act and said he did not expect immediate changes to Northampton County’s district composition; he described that matter as beyond the county’s control and said staff will ensure candidates appear on correct ballots regardless of higher-court rulings.
He also reviewed a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision confirming that cast-vote records (CVRs) can be requested through the state Right-to-Know law, but noted limits on production depending on the county’s election hardware. The Department of State will issue guidance to counties tailored to the types of voting equipment in use, and the county will implement that guidance when received.
Finally, the solicitor outlined ongoing litigation about undated or misdated ballot envelopes that was decided in the Third Circuit and is now before the U.S. Supreme Court for possible review. The Third Circuit had held that undated or misdated outer envelopes may be counted; the U.S. Supreme Court has ordered Northampton County to provide a response after the county initially filed a notice of nonparticipation. The solicitor said Northampton County typically does not take a lead role in this litigation and will comply with any controlling court order.
Commissioners agreed to defer substantive debate until the later agenda item that specifically addresses litigation posture. The solicitor said he will review the county’s prior filings and prepare any necessary response consistent with Northampton County’s position.
The solicitor also cautioned the commission that a pending Supreme Court decision in a Mississippi case concerning ballots received after election day could affect Pennsylvania rules for military and overseas ballots and that the Department of State would be expected to issue implementation guidance.
The commission took no formal legal action at the meeting; staff will report back if and when Department of State guidance or new court orders require operational changes.
