Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Complete Streets Middlefield topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Middlefield Road concept advances; staff recommends against full corridor road diet now because of capacity and grant constraints
Summary
Staff presented a complete-streets concept for Middlefield Road that would convert part‑time bike lanes to protected facilities, remove parking in segments, and add pedestrian and bike infrastructure. Staff said a corridor-wide road diet would harm capacity and risk OBAG3 grant deadlines; residents urged quicker parking removal and protected lanes for safety.
City staff presented a concept design for the Middlefield Road Complete Streets Project and solicited committee feedback after a lengthy public-comment period in which residents pressed for protected bike lanes, parking removal and lower speed limits.
The proposed project covers Middlefield Road between several city nodes and would add separated bike facilities, resurfacing, new pedestrian signals, ADA curb ramp upgrades and buffered bike lanes at conflict zones. Staff reported the city has secured multiple grants for the corridor, including OBAG3 and housing-focused funds; OBAG3 obligations must be met by January 2027.
Project staff summarized a technical analysis of a potential road diet (removing a vehicle lane in each direction) and concluded it would cause degraded intersection level-of-service, increased vehicle queues and potential impacts to emergency response times on several segments. “Implementing the road diet would result in degraded operational conditions and increased queuing,” staff said, and because modifying lanes and intersection geometry on the State Route 85 bridge would require Caltrans approval, staff recommended postponing any bridge changes to a separate future project so the current OBAG3 funding schedule is not jeopardized.
The committee and many residents urged more aggressive interim measures. Several speakers, including bicycle commuters and neighborhood residents, described frequent parking in bike lanes, high vehicle speeds and unsafe pedestrian crossings near the SR‑85 overpass. “Middlefield is the only way you can get from one side of Mountain View to the other east to west on one road,” said Greg Colonado, a resident. Public commenters asked staff to advance parking removal, trial quick-build protections (striping and temporary bollards), reduce posted speed limits, and coordinate with transit agencies to avoid creating new conflict points at bus stops.
Staff said several quick-build actions could be feasible but cautioned they require formal noticing, council approval and staffing to implement and maintain. For bus-stop areas where buses stop in the bike lane, staff recommended green conflict-zone striping and case-by-case consideration of in-lane vs. outboard boarding; full in-lane bus stops would require additional right-of-way in some locations.
Staff advised the committee that while some BPAC members urged immediate parking removal and earlier conversion to full-time protected bike lanes, advancing a full corridor road diet now would likely require redesign and could threaten the OBAG3 funding schedule. Staff proposed moving forward with design for the current funding package, completing final plans by the end of 2026 and seeking construction funding for summer 2027; bridge-specific improvements and some intersection reconstructions would be scoped as separate future projects requiring Caltrans and VTA coordination.
Committee members and staff agreed to pursue near-term steps where feasible: refine the design, investigate quick-build pilot options (parking removal and temporary protections), confirm OBAG3 timing and flexibility with regional partners, and return to the committee and council with final plans and any funding requests. The committee did not take a formal vote on project alternatives at this meeting.
Next steps: staff will continue design work, evaluate quick-build and parking-removal feasibility in coordination with street maintenance and transit providers, and present final plans and funding recommendations to the City Council later in the year.
