Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Quiet Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners OK diagnostic review of Ainsin Road rail crossing after residents press for quiet‑zone study
Summary
Following resident advocacy, the board unanimously directed the county manager to initiate a diagnostic review of the Ainsin (Patterson Lake) Road railroad crossing to assess feasible safety measures, quiet‑zone options and costs; staff estimated the diagnostic itself would cost about $2,000 and flagged potential annual insurance premiums of $100,000–$120,000 per crossing.
The Thurston County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to direct the county manager to initiate a diagnostic review of the Ainsin (Patterson Lake) Road railroad crossing to evaluate the feasibility and costs of establishing an FRA quiet zone.
Commissioner Claus introduced the request as a narrow, first‑step motion: the diagnostic review is intended to produce engineering and procedural findings that will allow the board to compare safety improvements, quiet‑zone implementation pathways and associated cost estimates before choosing whether to pursue a formal quiet‑zone establishment.
Public works staff told the board the expected out‑of‑pocket cost for the diagnostic is modest—roughly $2,000 to cover railroad staff participation—because Federal Railroad Administration and UTC staff typically attend at no cost. Staff said they would pay any diagnostic fee from the department’s professional‑services budget.
County risk and insurance staff cautioned, however, that potential insurance costs for an operational quiet zone can be substantial. Risk staff reported that underwriters (including Lloyd’s of London in other jurisdictions) have priced annual premiums in the neighborhood of $100,000–$120,000 per crossing with policy limits of about $1 million per incident; the county would also face first‑loss defense exposure around $100,000 on claims where it is named. Risk staff said those figures are preliminary until a diagnostic identifies specific supplemental safety measures and a construction timeline.
Commissioners and staff emphasized the diagnostic does not create a quiet zone and does not commit the county to pay future construction or annual insurance costs. Several commissioners urged caution because the county’s road fund is already under strain: recent reductions removed staffing and deferred capital transfers, and staff said the fund will require further adjustments unless new revenue or funding strategies are found.
The motion directs the county manager to return to the board with the diagnostic review results, including all feasible safety improvements, quiet‑zone pathway options and associated costs.
"This is a first step — it's a diagnostic review, not an implementation decision," Commissioner Claus said when introducing the motion. "We can evaluate costs, risk and equity once we have the results."
