Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Research Agenda topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Michigan Sentencing Commission launches with data-driven research plan
Summary
At its inaugural meeting, the Michigan Sentencing Commission outlined a research agenda using MDOC pre-sentence investigation data back to 2003 to assess guideline compliance, sentence-length trends and geographic variation and promised an annual report due each December.
The newly reconstituted Michigan Sentencing Commission opened its first meeting with Chair Judge Chris Yates urging a data-driven review of the state's sentencing guidelines.
"Our responsibility here is not to make law," Yates said, but added the commission can be "helpful to the legislature in recommending potential changes to the sentencing guidelines." He told members the panel will pursue a "holistic overview" of how the guidelines operate in practice.
Staff chief John Cooper and research director Grady Bridges described the commission's primary data source as Michigan Department of Corrections pre-sentence investigation (PSI) reports. Bridges said the staff is finalizing a data-sharing agreement with MDOC to obtain two core tables (demographics and offense/scoring details) with records dating reliably to 2003 and monthly updates going forward. "We are in a situation where we have a lot of information to get our arms around," Bridges said, framing two initial research priorities: guideline compliance (whether judges sentence within guideline ranges and how departures vary) and sentence-length trends (uniformity and proportionality).
Staff outlined a tentative schedule for public presentations and reporting: a June briefing on guideline compliance and sentence-length factors; a September review of geographic variation and crime-type trends; and preparation of the commission's statutorily required annual report, which staff said should be filed by December and will summarize legislative policy changes, jail and prison impacts, and probation trends. Cooper and Bridges also said the office can run ad hoc quantitative analyses of proposed legislative changes when requested.
Members asked several clarifying questions about the data. Dean Cheryl Kubak asked why analyses would start in 2003 rather than 1998; staff explained older records are not available in a consistent, analyzable form and that MDOC's data systems reach a reliable baseline around 2003. Kyle Kaminsky, the MDOC designate of Director Heidi Washington, described the department's PSI process that generates the reports the commission will use.
The commission plans regular meetings and said staff will circulate schedule proposals; Cooper said the office will also provide administrative details such as mileage and parking reimbursement. The chair said he will appoint a guideline-recommendations subcommittee to vet technical proposals and draft recommended changes for the full commission to consider.
