Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Chapter 38 Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners begin review of Chapter 38; staff to distribute 74-page packet for next meeting
Summary
The Planning Commission opened a multi-meeting review of proposed Chapter 38 amendments, agreed to distribute a 74-page packet by email, and discussed scope, zoning initiation, setbacks, and conservation provisions that may affect density. No votes were held; substantive review will continue at future meetings.
The Oconee County Planning Commission on April 6 opened a review of proposed amendments to Chapter 38 of the county code and agreed to continue detailed consideration at future meetings.
Commissioners received a 74-page packet of proposed changes and decided there would be no votes that night. Staff will email the marked packet to commissioners for review; the commission plans to begin with Article 1 and work through Article 12 at subsequent sessions until review is complete.
Mr. Haney provided a synopsis of the review and raised several substantive concerns about scope, clarity of authority, and potential unintended consequences. "We wanted to make sure that the scope of the ordinance was well defined, so it could not have different interpretations depending upon who was in the position of authority at the time," Mr. Haney said, urging clearer language to prevent variable application.
He flagged several specific areas for attention: the process by which rezoning can be initiated (noting that a small share of residents could effect change for an entire district), placement of landscape rules (which he suggested may belong in a standalone landscape ordinance rather than mixed into zoning articles), setback tables that scale by lot size within a single 'control-free' district, and a conservation provision that could permit densities (for example, up to five homes per acre) that may be inconsistent with county expectations.
Commissioners discussed how existing district classifications and voluntary, more-restrictive self-zoning interact with the proposed language and emphasized the need to preserve stability for property owners who expect consistent standards. No formal decisions were made; the commission will continue review and amendments at upcoming meeting(s).
