Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Minutes Accuracy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Representative Nash moves to reconsider May 15 minutes after Representative Jordan questions timestamps

Rules Committee · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Jordan flagged a discrepancy in the May 15 minutes’ recorded times; Representative Nash moved to reconsider the May 15 minutes and the committee put the motion to a voice vote.

Representative Nash moved to reconsider the Rules Committee minutes from May 15 after Representative Jordan raised a question about how a start and adjournment time were recorded.

Representative Jordan said the May 15 minutes “doesn't mean it was called to order at 11:30AM. But the meeting was adjourned at 11. 0, 5, And I'm just wondering how we did that,” prompting a point of order and follow-up discussion about minute accuracy. Members debated whether the timing in the minutes accurately reflected the meeting record.

After the exchange, Representative Nash offered a motion to reconsider the May 15 minutes. The transcript records the motion and a voice vote; the chair called for those in favor to say “Aye.” The transcript indicates the motion was put to a voice vote. The chair said the committee would take up outstanding items at its next meeting.

Why it matters: Meeting minutes are the official record of committee action and votes; members questioned whether the published times accurately reflected when the meeting began and ended, and moved to revisit the adopted minutes to correct or clarify the record if needed.

Next steps: The committee moved the reconsideration and the chair indicated the item will be taken up again at a subsequent meeting.