Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comp Plan Edits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines edits to comprehensive plan; public comment remains open and hearing continued
Summary
Planning staff reviewed redline edits and staff-proposed substantive changes in natural environment, built environment and definition chapters, noted 26 written comments, and the commission continued the public hearing and left public comment open until March 17.
Staff summarized the comprehensive-plan redline (attachment C) and highlighted three substantive policy areas for detailed review: natural environment (including wildfire prevention language and rural agricultural map updates), built environment (including community housing criteria and Highway 82 language), and utilities (stormwater best-management practices and limits on extension outside UGBs).
Hannah Hunt told commissioners staff received 26 written comments and identified minor blue-markup edits (typos, photo credits) and purple substantive edits in response to public feedback. Examples staff proposed included adding a sentence that "Wildfire prevention is critically important to our community and requires collaborative partnerships between local, state, and federal land managers in conjunction with community partners," clarifying that job counts include sole proprietors in the data sources, and adding stormwater best-management practice guidance requested by Eagle County.
Staff also proposed clarifying definitions (cluster development, semi-urban areas, lodging vs residential in resort areas) and cross-checking terminology across chapters. On utilities, staff revised policy to say logical utility extensions outside UGBs should be "limited and regulated" and "considered only where utility capacity currently exists," with parameters that speak to water capacity, financial and environmental constraints, prioritizing electric utilities/renewables, and avoiding expansion where infrastructure is insufficient.
Next steps: commissioners asked staff to make drafting clarifications (for example, whether the plan should require "existing" infrastructure capacity), align the utilities policy with community-housing language, and return with revised wording at the March 17 meeting. Public comment remained open and the hearing was continued to March 17 at 4:30 p.m.
Ending: No final adoption occurred; staff will bring revised language and cross-references at the next scheduled hearing.
