Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Intergovernmental Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nash County joins neighbors in opposing earlier language of Senate Bill 214 after debate over whether measure still contained the clause
Summary
The board approved a resolution opposing a previously proposed provision of Senate Bill 214 that would have allowed another county to acquire interests in property across county lines; commissioners were split over whether the clause had already been removed from the bill but voted to register opposition in solidarity with neighboring counties.
Get email alerts on the Intergovernmental Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Nash County Board of Commissioners voted May 4 to adopt a resolution opposing a provision that had been proposed in North Carolina Senate Bill 214 which would have allowed one county to acquire an interest in real property located in neighboring counties without those counties' consent. The measure provoked a heated exchange among commissioners about state legislative process and local control.
Supporters said adopting the resolution sends an important message to Raleigh and to neighboring counties such as Halifax that Nash County objects to any state action that would strip local boards of control over county property and interfere with governing authority. Commissioner Wilkins told the board the measure would set a troubling precedent and said Nash County should stand with neighboring counties.
Opponents of an immediate resolution argued that the specific controversial language had been removed from the bill before the meeting and that issuing a formal resolution risked politicizing a legislative process that was already under correction. Commissioner How said the provision had been removed and preferred to monitor proceedings through legislative channels rather than pass a preemptive resolution.
The board adopted the resolution in support of Halifax County and other local governments; two commissioners recorded opposing votes based on the view that the contested language was no longer active in the bill.
What’s next: Nash County’s resolution is intended as a formal record of opposition and may be transmitted to state legislators and neighboring counties.

