Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves annexation and master plan for 1,919-acre Grand View Buckeye mega-site
Summary
The Buckeye City Council unanimously approved annexation and related development actions for the Grand View Buckeye mega-site, clearing the way for a rail-served employment campus and optional residential and commercial areas while preserving language that the State Route 30 alignment shown in plan exhibits is conceptual only.
Mayor Orsborn opened a public hearing and the council approved annexation and the companion community master plan (CMP) and development agreement for the Grand View Buckeye project by unanimous vote. The action covers roughly 1,919 acres to be annexed and additional in-city acreage to be governed by the CMP and a 25-year development agreement.
The CMP, presented by Mr. Glica and Alan Bodwin of Norris Design, designates large portions of the site for "regional employment" uses with rail access prioritized, allows up to 32 acres of community commercial, and creates a "residential village" district that could accommodate up to 6,500 units if developed. The document includes tailored standards to limit heavier industrial uses along exterior streets, required landscape buffers, and design standards for street-facing facades. The development agreement permits reimbursement of regional or oversized infrastructure (water/wastewater, public safety facility and equipment) from new tax revenues generated by eligible economic uses once $10 million of revenue is reached.
Why it matters: Council and staff described the site as a "mega-site" with nearly two miles of rail frontage and regional infrastructure potential. City officials said the annexation and CMP aim to hold future development to a higher standard than county rules and to position Buckeye to attract large industrial and advanced manufacturing employers.
Public concerns and responses: Two residents from the Liberty area raised concerns about the CMP's conceptual depiction of State Route 30 near the property. Farmer Daryl Kuiper and descendant Steven Bales Jr. urged the council not to be interpreted as endorsing a final SR 30 alignment. Kuiper said the mapping "sets a precedence that stakeholders would like to go on record" and Bales warned that showing SR 30 could appear as the city's stamp on a route that will ultimately be decided by ADOT and MAG. City staff and the mayor emphasized the exhibit is conceptual and not an endorsement; the record includes council statements clarifying that the city is not approving a specific SR 30 alignment as part of this annexation.
Next steps: With annexation and CMP approval, future rezoning and project-specific development applications will return to council for formal entitlements and review of infrastructure phasing and reimbursements. Staff noted that if the council had rejected annexation, subsequent rezoning and the CMP would not proceed.
