Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Masterplan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Draft Unity Meadows park plan prioritizes playgrounds, multiuse court and walking loops; staff flags phasing and school adjacency
Summary
City planners presented a draft master plan for the 6.16‑acre Unity Meadows Neighborhood Park after outreach that drew 162 survey responses. The preferred concept emphasizes a playground, looped trails, game tables, fitness stations and a multiuse sports court; staff said phasing is likely because current impact fees won’t fund full buildout.
Vacaville park planners on May 6 presented a draft master plan for Unity Meadows Neighborhood Park that lays out playgrounds for ages 2–5 and 5–12, looped walking trails, a multiuse sports court, adult fitness stations, picnic areas and a fenced dog run option. The 6.16‑acre site lies within the Vanden Meadows subdivision, a development approved in 2013 that is planned for about 780 homes (approximately 649 built to date). The plan follows a community outreach campaign that included an online survey with 162 responses; staff said 82% of respondents live within a mile of the site.
Why it matters: The master plan establishes the city’s preferred layout and gives staff the details needed to cost and phase construction. Commissioners pressed staff on how the new park would interface with a nearby school site and requested clearer phasing options because development impact fees will not cover everything shown in the full buildout.
Planned features and outreach: Associate park planner Trisha Kagot and consultant Amy Latam of Verde Design described two initial concept alternatives and the community’s favored hybrid. “We had 162 responses and 82% lived within a mile of Unity Meadows,” Kagot said, summarizing the survey. The preferred plan shows a central open lawn, a 5–12 play structure separated by a seat wall from a 2–5 play area, climbing boulders, shaded picnic plaza with game tables, multiple walking loops (the perimeter loop about four‑tenths of a mile) and a cluster of active amenities including a half‑court basketball and pickleball‑style courts.
Commissioners’ concerns: Several commissioners asked how the park would relate to a possible school parcel immediately adjacent to the park. Staff said the 28.41‑acre school site was identified in the subdivision plan but the school district has not set a timetable; staff proposed a landscape buffer and said final interface decisions will be coordinated if and when the district advances a school project. Commissioners also debated the sports court configuration — a half‑court basketball surface currently shown could be striped for multiple uses; some commissioners said they’d prefer options that support volleyball or multiple‑court play for community access.
Cost, phasing and next steps: Staff told the commission that the city’s current development impact fee balance for the park is limited and that site grading and other hard costs make phasing likely. Nemo Gonzalez, park planning manager, said staff will refine what a realistic Phase 1 could be and return with options showing which elements can be delivered now and which would wait for future funding. The commission asked staff to return with explicit Phase 1 scenarios and associated cost details before formal adoption.
What’s next: Staff will continue outreach and finalize the master plan for return to the commission with recommended phasing and a clearer estimate of the first phase’s scope and cost. The commission also requested that staff evaluate multiuse court surfacing options and dog‑run specifications, and to include maintenance requirements and fixture placement (bag stations, benches) in the Phase 1 proposal.
