Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs master‑plan overhaul, part‑time project manager and changes to fees and permits
Summary
Council discussed commissioning a master‑plan reexamination and hiring a consultant, debated creating a part‑time business administrator or project manager role, and reviewed proposed ordinance and fee changes for weddings, parking, animal licensing and short‑term rentals.
Council members opened a multi‑part discussion on planning and city administration that covered master‑plan/zoning reexamination, potential staffing changes and proposed ordinance/fee updates.
Master plan and zoning: Councilors said the Cornell project highlighted the need for a reexamination and proposed issuing an RFP for a planning consultant to produce a re‑examination report and recommend ordinance changes. The group suggested pulling data on past variances and working with the historic‑preservation commission and the Delaware Canal Commission (executive director John Hutchinson was referenced) to ensure continuity with neighboring plans.
City administration: Members revisited earlier talks with Frenchtown about a shared business‑administrator position (now declined) and debated hiring a part‑time business administrator versus a project manager who would supervise capital projects, grants and HR matters. Several councilors said the role should be carefully scoped (hours, benefits threshold at 30 hours/week, reporting structure) and that a job description and organizational chart be prepared before recruitment.
Ordinances and fees: Staff outlined proposed updates and rate changes including registry copy fees, wedding ceremony fees (proposal discussed: resident $100; non‑resident $150–$200), parks non‑resident user fees and deposits, leased parking monthly rates, animal licensing fee increases, and Airbnb registration late‑fee enforcement. Council directed staff to refine ordinance language and provide precedent research before votes.
Why it matters: A re‑examination of the master plan and clearer administrative roles could change how future development proposals are evaluated, while changes to fees and enforcement directly affect residents and businesses.
Next steps: Council requested an RFP outline for planning consulting, a defined job description and organizational structure for any administrator/project manager role, and refined ordinance language and cost analyses for fee changes.
