Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances draft economic-incentive policy toward July 28 vote after clarifying definitions and review roles
Summary
Trustees reviewed an updated economic-incentive policy with clarified definitions, eligibility rules, environmental criteria and performance benchmarks; staff will revise language (including clarifying village share of tax abatements) and present the draft for formal action on July 28.
The Committee of the Whole spent an extended session on July 14 reviewing a revised economic-incentive policy intended to guide tax abatements, facade and renovation grants (PIP), and other incentives. Staff (Libby) summarized changes: added definitions and guiding principles, clarified eligibility (no village defaults or violations), tied eligible costs to façade and project scope rather than standalone upgrades, and included environmentally sustainable upgrades as eligible under certain circumstances.
Trustees discussed practical implementation details, including whether the village should explicitly say that any tax abatements would apply only to the village’s portion of sales or property tax, and whether Planning & Zoning rather than the Economic Development Commission should review larger facade and renovation grants given potential zoning variances. Staff agreed to add clarifying language and to return the revised policy to the board for a vote on July 28.
Board members emphasized predictability, performance benchmarks, and annual review by the village manager; staff noted the village reserves the right to withhold or modify incentives. The committee did not take a final vote but directed staff to incorporate the board’s changes and logistical clarifications for the next meeting.
