Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community petitions request Bibles, pledge and curriculum reviews; board takes no action
Summary
Residents presented eight petitions asking OUHSD to add Christian Bibles to libraries, permit recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance, display 'In God We Trust,' provide voluntary Bible instruction, require parental disclosures for health education, and review certain curricula; the board received the petitions but took no action tonight.
A group of parents and community members known in public comment as presenting “Mary’s vision” or representing “We the People” delivered eight petitions to the Oxnard Union High School District board on April 22. Petitioners sought district consideration of faith‑oriented resources and practices, among them placing a Christian Bible in each high‑school library, providing opportunities to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, displaying the national motto "In God We Trust" on school entryways, offering voluntary weekly Bible instruction with parental permission, requiring parental disclosure/consent for certain health education content (including abstinence instruction), and evaluating materials by Ben Carson and David Barton (WallBuilders) for possible use as supplemental resources.
Speakers including Mary Kaiser and several parents outlined the eight proposals and said the petitions represented thousands of signatures; Mary Kaiser said the petitions were offered as “positive suggestions… from parents, students, and citizens who care deeply about the educational and moral development of our young people.” Other speakers emphasized the historical or civic value of materials and described voluntary, parent‑permission frameworks they proposed.
No motion to place the items on the board’s action calendar was made: staff introduced the eight requests and said there are undetermined costs associated with any adoption, and without a trustee motion the board did not open formal discussion or vote on the petitions. The board’s role under the Brown Act and existing policy was cited: public comment may be received, but action requires an agendized item or a motion to place it on a future agenda. In short, the requests were received and documented; they were not approved nor rejected tonight.
Context and next steps: Several trustees said many of the practices requested (student‑led faith clubs, voluntary participation in the pledge, parental notification for instructional content) already exist under district policy or state law, while others asked for legal counsel review and clearer policy language on how external petitions are scheduled for board consideration. Trustees suggested staff could return with a formal agenda item if the board chooses to consider any of the specific petitions for action at a future meeting.
The board took no formal action on the eight petitions at the April 22 meeting.
