Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Manager Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate city manager appointment, annual review and removal rules
Summary
Steering members debated clarifying who nominates the city manager, annual review frequency, residency expectations for the manager, and whether removal should require a simple majority or a higher threshold; they also discussed short-term vs longer-term succession and whether the deputy should automatically act as interim manager.
Get email alerts on the City Manager Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A range of proposals about the city manager’s appointment, review and removal were debated in depth during the steering-committee meeting.
The chair proposed clarifying appointment language so that the mayor, as council chair, nominates the city manager and the appointment is confirmed by a majority of council. The chair also proposed that the council establish a committee led by the mayor to conduct “fair and regular reviews according to a schedule mutually agreed upon in the employment contract ... amounting to at least one performance review per year.”
Commissioners discussed residency expectations for incoming city-manager candidates. The chair suggested language that would require a nonlocal hire to establish residency within Tompkins County (or a contiguous county) within 12 months of appointment; members debated whether the requirement should be parallel and straightforward or include exceptions for nearby counties.
On removal, the chair advanced a proposal to authorize simple-majority removal in the charter while moving detailed procedures to council rules of procedure; other members pressed to retain protections for due process and anti-discrimination and flagged that some removal standards also appear in the manager’s employment contract. Clyde Flitterlin and others emphasized distinguishing emergency short-term succession (a manager-designated acting manager for immediate coverage) from a long-term permanent vacancy, which should be handled by the council appointment process.
The steering committee asked staff to draft alternative, parallel wording for short-term emergency succession and for council appointment of an interim manager in the event of a permanent vacancy. The matter will return to the full commission for deliberation.

