Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and educators urge Clay County School Board to press lawmakers on funding and voucher oversight
Summary
At the May 7 Clay County School Board meeting, parents, educators and community members urged the board to publicly press Florida lawmakers for increased K–12 funding and tighter oversight of voucher programs, and several speakers delivered specific funding requests and allegations about lost public dollars.
Parents, educators and other community members used the public-comment portion of the Clay County School Board’s May 7 meeting to urge the board to take a public stance asking state lawmakers to increase K–12 funding and to tighten accountability for private-school vouchers.
Jackie Snar, a Clay County resident since 1992, told the board that a state budget that “does not keep pace with inflation is in reality a cut” and asked trustees to join Superintendent David Broski in publicly opposing what she called unfair voucher spending. “Klay County students cannot afford another year of underfunding and misplaced priorities,” Snar said, adding that the district recently faced personnel reductions and, she alleged, “our county has lost 30 million to vouchers.”
The plea was echoed by Aaron Frick, a parent and volunteer, who praised district teachers and warned the board of potential federal funding losses under the FY2027 budget. “Klay County is at risk of losing another $4 million,” Frick said, and urged elected officials to hold voucher programs accountable and to prioritize neighborhood schools.
Dr. Walsh, speaking later in the public-comment period, read provisions of the Florida Constitution and urged the board to draft and approve a resolution urging the legislature to increase public-school funding by $1,000 per student and to demand transparency and accountability from voucher and charter programs. “Public schools deserve a level playing field,” she said, and left a draft resolution with the board for consideration.
Board members did not take immediate formal action on the speakers’ requests during the meeting. Several trustees later expressed general support for educators in their remarks, and individual members suggested bringing discussion items or draft language to a future workshop. No vote on a funding or voucher resolution was recorded on May 7.
Why it matters: Speakers framed the issue as an immediate budget pressure with operational effects (staff reductions, program cuts) and urged the board to use its public voice before state legislative conference committee meetings scheduled May 12–15.
What the speakers said (highlights): “An increase that does not keep pace with inflation is in reality a cut,” Jackie Snar said, urging the board to demand adequate funding and accountability for voucher spending. “Will you speak up for our students?” Aaron Frick asked the board, emphasizing teacher support and accountability for voucher dollars.
What the board did: The board accepted public comment and later adopted the consent agenda by motion (see separate meeting action). Trustees did not adopt a funding or voucher resolution during the meeting; speakers left draft language and asked the board to consider it at a future workshop or meeting.
Next steps: Speakers requested that the board publicly press state lawmakers and consider drafting a resolution; several board members indicated willingness to review materials and to place items on a workshop agenda for further discussion.
