Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Paulding board dismisses one zoning item, approves rezoning and Planning Commission bylaw change

Paulding County Board of Commissioners · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board dismissed a convenience store rezoning application without prejudice after the applicant failed to appear, approved a rezoning to agricultural for a property owner seeking to run farmland and build a barn, and adopted a Planning Commission bylaw change allowing the commission chair to vote.

Paulding County commissioners took several Planning Commission–related actions, including dismissing one zoning case without prejudice, approving another rezoning, and updating Planning Commission bylaws.

The board dismissed a Stanson Porter SPSA application to remove a stipulation that previously prohibited coin‑operated amusement machines (COAM) for a proposed convenience store with fuel pumps; staff explained that the applicant was not present and that under the Unified Development Ordinance the board could continue, table or dismiss without prejudice. The board voted to dismiss the application without prejudice, which leaves the applicant able to reapply without waiting 12 months.

Separately, the board approved application 2026‑02‑Z by Blake (transcript: “Blake Isabel Carnis”) to rezone about 10.66 acres from R‑2 suburban residential to A‑1 agricultural to allow farmland use and construction of a barn for horses. Planning staff reported a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission.

Staff also presented a bylaw update for the Paulding County Planning Commission to allow the commission chair to vote; the board approved the bylaw change. Planning staff and the chair discussed the procedural change before the motion passed by voice vote.

The meeting record contains limited public comment on these items and does not list applicant representatives for the dismissed case.