Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parish Finances topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Avoyelles Parish finance chief reports revenues, warns general fund bears many unfunded mandates
Summary
At the May 7 committee meeting, the parish finance report listed state revenue sharing of $52,516 and detailed sales‑tax and other fund distributions; jurors were reminded the general fund covers many unfunded services and that road-improvement projects are underway.
Miss Jamie presented the parish’s cash‑balance overview for the month and walked jurors through recent receipts and fund allocations. She said state revenue‑sharing payments totaled $52,516 and outlined distributions to the general fund, the library, drainage and the health unit. Sales tax receipts for March were reported (figures in the packet showed a larger total but portions of the transcript figures are garbled and not fully specified by the parish report). Miss Jamie stressed that the general fund continues to shoulder unfunded mandates and reassured jurors that the parish remains financially solvent.
The report listed deposits to restricted funds (library, drainage, health) and identified occupational license and motel collections separately. Jurors asked for clarification about fines remitted by Marksville city court; Miss Jamie noted the parish receives a percentage of those fines but does not receive the full amount and did not provide the exact percent. The finance presentation also flagged upcoming work with Delta Engineering on road improvements and noted that hauling of white goods has generated revenue in recent weeks (reported as about $31,000 to date).
Why it matters: those revenue streams and fund allocations determine whether the parish can maintain services and fund capital projects without drawing down reserves. Jurors used the report as a springboard to discuss near‑term capital needs and grant work that could offset local expenditures.
The jury took no formal vote on budget changes at this meeting. Committee members requested more precise breakdowns for some collections (the exact sales‑tax deposit figures and the percentage of city‑court fines remitted to the parish were noted as "not specified" in the report) and asked staff to continue providing monthly updates ahead of regular meetings.
