Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning And Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council moves several land-use items forward: rezoning, comprehensive-plan amendment and setback exceptions
Summary
Council approved a first reading to rezone a 50th Avenue parcel from single-family to agricultural reserve, adopted a resolution to change the Rosewood North future land use to low-density residential, and advanced an ordinance to allow limited yard-setback exceptions for non-residential uses such as schools.
The Norwalk City Council acted on multiple land-use items, approving readings and a resolution that affect zoning and the city’s comprehensive plan.
Rezoning request: Council took first reading of an ordinance to rezone a parcel on 50th Avenue from R1 (single-family residential) to AR (agricultural reserve) so the current owner can build agricultural structures such as a horse barn. Luke described that the parcel was left undeveloped when surrounding parcels were rezoned and that no public comments were received.
Comprehensive-plan amendment: Council approved a resolution to change the future land use for an area near Highway R63 and Debuke/Delaware Street (the recorded Rosewood North plat) from medium-density residential and commercial/industrial flex to low-density residential. Staff noted a 1979 recorded plat and floodplain considerations; PNZ recommended approval before the council vote.
Setback exceptions for schools: The council advanced the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 175A.21 to clarify that certain non-residential uses located in residential districts (for example, schools) may place specific items such as fire escapes or stairs within a 10-foot side-yard setback while preserving a 50-foot setback for primary structures. The change was proposed to address a specific request from Main Street School to add a fire escape where existing lot geometry otherwise made complying with the current 50-foot side setback impossible.
Councilors said no oral or written comments were received on these items during the meetings where hearings were open; in several cases council approved first readings or resolutions as staff presented them. The items will proceed through the required second readings or follow-up steps as defined by city code.
