Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cold Spring Harbor holds budget hearing; board presented 2.69% tax-levy proposal ahead of May 19 vote

Cold Spring Harbor Central School District Board of Education · May 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the May 5 budget hearing, district officials presented a proposed 2026–27 budget and outlined instructional and program priorities. The presentation cited a 2.69% proposed tax-levy increase (reported to be under the 3.45% cap); the transcript rendering of the total-dollar figure in the presentation is unclear.

Dr. Allison Offerman Solantano led the statutorily required budget hearing at the Cold Spring Harbor Central School District board meeting on May 5, previewing the district’s proposed 2026–27 budget and the May 19 community vote.

The presenter described a budget-to-budget increase of 2.41% and a proposed tax levy increase of 2.69%, which she said is below the district’s allowable cap of 3.45%. The transcript contains a garbled rendering of the total-dollar amount presented; the hearing slides and presenter emphasized the percentage changes and programmatic investments rather than a readable line-item total in the transcript excerpt.

Key budget priorities flagged in the presentation included expanded course offerings (AP cybersecurity, an AP business/personal finance course, a real-estate course and marine research honors), greater counseling and literacy supports (including additional math and literacy coaches and a science specialist), continued investment in arts and extracurriculars, technology refreshes and facilities planning. Officials emphasized student-centered and inquiry-based learning (illustrative math expansion, more hands-on science lab experiences and increased research opportunities) as budgeted priorities.

The presenter also reviewed contingency-budget rules should voters not approve the proposition: under contingency the district could not increase the tax levy, purchase new equipment, enter new multi-year contracts, or fund new capital work; the board estimated contingency reductions would be in the low six-figure range based on administrative caps and required calculations.

Board members asked clarifying questions about how the budget specifically fosters critical thinking; the administration pointed to the illustrative-math expansion (grades 3–6), new lab experiences in science, and expanded research and AP offerings as direct investments to strengthen inquiry, argumentation and real-world problem solving.

What’s next: The district’s budget vote and board election are scheduled for May 19 at the Ralph Whitney Fieldhouse; the budget presented at the hearing is the proposal that will appear on the ballot unless the board amends it prior to the vote.

Note on figures: The transcript’s rendering of the proposed total-dollar amount (as spoken in the hearing) is unclear in the record provided; the tax-levy percentage and percentage changes were clearly stated in the presentation and are reported above.