Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: committee approves multiple construction contracts, signage award; several change orders noted

Capital Construction Committee · May 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved several contractor payments, small procurement items and the Tollgate signage award; it tabled a wastewater design amendment for further bidding clarification and recorded multiple PCO approvals tied to Pilgrim and Tollgate projects.

At its meeting, the Capital Construction Committee voted on a series of procurement and payment items tied to the Pilgrim and Tollgate projects.

Key outcomes:

- Bid award (Bid 2600220) for accessibility upgrades at several sites was approved and the chair called the motion carried after one member recorded opposition. The recommended vendor for the overall bid was accepted.

- Columbus Door estimate ($7,650) for envelope door replacements was approved on a motion; one dissent was recorded.

- ECM abatement consultant contract ($16,100) for monitoring and air testing was approved.

- A revision request for wastewater design (Sakosha & Associates, ~$20,142) was tabled pending bidding clarifications; the committee voted to table the item for further review.

- Multiple PCOs related to design-bulletin items, fireproofing (6,600 sq ft; code-required), and owner-requested scope (drive-surface concrete upgrade) were presented and, where indicated, approved. The committee approved a credit (PCO 959981) that removes certain alternates while preserving underground infrastructure for future connection.

- The Tollgate signage package was awarded to Clayton LLC (DBA Bluebird Graphic Solutions) for $615,130, below the GMP allowance; the committee approved the award and staff will hold remaining allowance funds for contingencies.

Where the transcript omitted a detailed roll call, staff recorded approvals as "motion carries" and in some instances noted a single opposed vote; names for each yes/no were not consistently read into the record. Where exact tallies or mover/second information was not specified in the transcript, the article notes those items as not specified.