Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vendor protests Shelby County Fire Department uniform award; commissioners send item to full commission
Summary
Alpha 1 Apparel owner presented a formal protest alleging procedural and spec violations after Mid South Solutions was recommended as low bidder for a $169,290 fire-uniform contract; county staff said the department rebid because negotiated union allotments increased costs. Commissioners sent the item to the full commission without recommendation pending further purchasing documentation.
Bridal Beazer, owner of Alpha 1 Apparel, pressed Shelby County commissioners to reconsider a contract award for the county fire department, saying the low-bid recommendation to Mid South Solutions violated both ordinance and purchasing policy. "There was a violation of both ordinance and policy in the award of this bid," Beazer told the committee, showing bid documents she said lacked required unit pricing and substitution information.
Deputy Chief Eric Jackson, Shelby County Fire Department, said the department had to rebid because the MOU-negotiated uniform allotment increased from $400 to $600 per person, driving the estimated need from the prior purchase order to roughly $170,000. "We had to put it out for a rebid because the old bid was no good at that time," Jackson said, urging the committee to consider the department's budget realities.
James Gloucester, an administrator in county purchasing, defended the procurement process: he said bids were opened publicly and the recommendation reflected the lowest acceptable bid at the time of opening. "They went through the sealed bid process, which is based on the lowest and the best price," Gloucester said. He added that purchasing did not handle contract renewals; those are department decisions.
After commissioners and the vendor exchanged documentation and follow-up questions, the committee voted to send the item to the full commission without a committee recommendation. The chair asked that Gloucester provide the two bid submittals behind the recommendation and other purchasing documentation before the Monday full commission meeting so commissioners can review the procurement record.
What's next: the full commission will consider the item on Monday; staff were asked to email the relevant bid documents in advance so the body can verify compliance with bid specifications and substitution/unit-price rules.
