Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors direct staff to pursue ministerial-permit reforms to speed reviews for small projects

Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After presentations and public comment, the board voted to receive and file Phase 3 planning proposals to expand ministerial approvals and reduce discretionary reviews for many small residential and commercial projects, and provided staff direction to draft code amendments that preserve protections for especially sensitive areas.

The Board of Supervisors on May 12 directed Planning Department staff to proceed with code amendments that would expand ministerial approvals and reduce appealable discretionary reviews for many small residential and commercial projects.

Planning staff and consultants described two main approaches: a hybrid model that sets objective criteria (e.g., parcel coverage, slope, FAR thresholds) to determine when ministerial approval is allowed, and a broader ministerial approach that would convert many routine permits to counter appeals and speed turnaround. Staff highlighted examples (ADUs, small accessory structures and limited commercial changes) that could move to counter-based processing, and showed visual examples of FAR and massing thresholds used elsewhere.

Public commenter Francis Romero urged more liberal ministerial allowances to reduce cost and delay for small-scale community activity (for example, farmer’s markets). Supervisors debated countywide uniform standards versus community-specific protections (Montecito, coastal areas), and raised issues including parking, traffic and historic/coastal protections. Several supervisors said the majority of simple projects should be ministerial but asked staff to carve out special areas and ensure design-review protections where appropriate.

The board voted to receive and file the staff report, provide the directions given during the hearing, and return with proposed ordinance language and maps identifying any special-area exceptions. Motions to receive the report and provide direction passed unanimously.