Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County public-health official warns August RFP will require heavy administrative lift for lead entity
Summary
Black Hawk County public-health staff briefed supervisors on an Iowa HHS RFP to designate a single lead entity for public-health services across 14 counties; the lead role would cover five core functions and significant contracting, fiscal, and compliance responsibilities, with a competitive RFP due in August and implementation beginning Jan. 1.
Caitlyn Emer, public health staff for Black Hawk County, told the Board of Supervisors on May 5 that Iowa Department of Health and Human Services plans to release a competitive RFP in August seeking a single lead entity to ensure five core public-health services across District 7, which includes 14 counties and roughly one-third of Iowa’s population.
Emer said the lead entity will be responsible for delivering communicable disease control, environmental health, chronic disease and injury prevention, maternal and child health, and public-health preparedness across the district. The role, she said, would also require contracting and subcontracting with local providers in each county and assume fiscal, compliance, and audit obligations.
The board was told a letter of intent will be due about one month after the August RFP is released and that implementation is slated to begin Jan. 1. Emer described the work as a significant administrative undertaking that could expose the lead entity and participating counties to additional federal audits and oversight, and she urged county officials to engage finance directors and other infrastructure partners early.
Emer said district-level coordination is underway; public-health entities representing the 14-county district plan to meet regularly between now and August to develop a shared approach, identify entities willing to be the lead applicant, and determine which providers would handle local delivery of the five core functions.
Board members asked about shared leadership models and how workload would be distributed. Emer said the RFP, as described in the notice, requires one applicant, but she anticipates that contracting arrangements and sharing agreements among counties and providers would be part of a practical solution. She recommended a future work session for supervisors after the counties have had more district-level planning.
The update did not include a named dollar figure for the RFP award or a finalized list of contracted services; details beyond the RFP notice were described as "still to come." The board did not take formal action on the item but directed staff to keep supervisors informed and suggested convening a work session once more planning information is available.
