Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Education members say Finance panel sidelined months of education work
Summary
Members of the Senate Education Committee told colleagues at the May 12 meeting they were frustrated after a major education bill was relieved from their jurisdiction and sent to the Senate Finance Committee; they say their months of work will inform the Finance Committee’s version but lamented losing control of policy details.
Members of the Senate Education Committee expressed sharp disappointment May 12 after the Senate floor relieved the panel of a long-studied education bill and sent it to the Finance Committee.
A committee member, speaking during the opening discussion, said the panel had spent “four and a half months” on the measure and asked for an explanation after the chair on the floor moved to relieve the committee of H955 and pass it to Senate Finance. “The Finance Committee has turned an education bill into a tax bill,” the committee member said, adding that the panel had worked on related language for two years.
Rick Seel of the Office of Legislative Council told the panel that the Finance Committee planned to use the Education Committee’s work as the foundation for its substitute. “The finance committee is going to take the version that we’ve been working on and make that the foundation,” Seel said, according to the committee discussion.
Several senators said they were frustrated but acknowledged that cross-committee referrals are common when a bill touches multiple jurisdictions, including tax provisions. One senator noted that complex bills frequently move among committees and that earlier committee work can inform later floor decisions.
Committee members discussed procedural options for preserving specific language and amendments they supported, including bringing amendments to the committee that holds the bill and preparing for last-stage floor activity. The panel agreed to reconvene as needed and to follow floor scheduling closely.
The committee did not take a final vote on the bill’s substantive provisions during the May 12 meeting; members said they expected to continue work as the legislation proceeds through other committees.
