Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Edtech Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scottsdale Unified starts drafting grade‑level device guidance and expands monitoring options after pandemic-era edtech growth
Summary
District technology and instructional leaders presented a historical review of onetoone deployment, filtering and monitoring tools, a draft grade‑by‑grade screen‑time guidance framework, and parent monitoring options (LightSpeed parent portal); trustees asked for clearer opt‑out pathways, stronger guidance for homework expectations and plans to narrow duplicative edtech tools.
Get email alerts on the Edtech Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scottsdale Unified leaders presented May 12 a district review of onetoone devices, pandemic-driven edtech growth, and draft guidance aimed at narrowing tools and clarifying appropriate screen time by grade level. IT and instructional staff traced the district’s path from mixed device inventories to a unified Chromebook/Windows strategy and shared device refresh-cycle budgets and warranty/service costs.
Staff explained the district’s filtering and monitoring posture under the Children’s Internet Protection Act and showed that LightSpeed monitoring and the LightSpeed parent portal can give parents post‑school visibility into device use. Officials noted fewer than 50 parents currently use the parent portal but said they will expand awareness and onboarding. The board amended the student code of conduct earlier in the meeting to eliminate bring‑your‑own‑device (BYOD) during the school day, a change staff said increases consistency and safety for classroom monitoring.
Instructional leaders proposed draft grade‑by‑grade guidance (examples: limited K–2 screen exposure in daily instruction; gradually more device time in middle/high school for coursework such as coding) and emphasized teacher training, consistent feedback expectations (rubrics and formative feedback) and a move to a single learning management system to reduce confusion. Trustees asked staff to publish survey results, provide opt‑out procedures for families who prefer devices remain at school, and return with a final set of systemwide practices for adoption ahead of the 2026–27 school year.
Next steps: staff will continue iterating the guidance, create family communications about the parent portal and opt‑out options, inventory district edtech tools for consolidation, and develop training plans for teachers.

