Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Phase Two Repurposing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District narrows phase‑two repurposing options and readies parent, staff surveys

Scottsdale Unified School District Governing Board · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After five committee meetings, Scottsdale Unified staff said they will run summer analysis on several narrowed models for phase‑two school repurposing, survey parents and staff this month, and present a SWAT analysis to the board in August ahead of a public hearing in September and a final decision in October.

Scottsdale Unified staff told the governing board May 12 they had narrowed the phase‑two repurposing committee’s options and will conduct further analysis over the summer. The committee — composed of parents, staff and community members — met five times to develop multiple models for shifting school configurations in learning communities where underutilization requires reconsideration of the district footprint.

District leaders described the next steps: a deeper analysis of the narrowed models (cost-savings estimates, feeder‑pattern and boundary implications, projected student “bleed” to other districts), a parent and staff survey to surface factors that would influence family decisions, and a public hearing in September. Staff said they expect a final board decision in October. The surveys are scheduled to go out later this week and will remain open for three weeks; district staff said they will monitor response rates and extend if necessary.

Superintendent staff emphasized the committee’s design: 42 members, table facilitations and refinements to models, and an intent to capture the attributes that matter to families (programs, proximity, before/after‑care, transportation). Board members asked for clarity on representation and survey timing; district counsel reminded trustees the committee is a superintendent‑appointed group and not a board committee, which affects open‑meeting requirements and direction. The staff will publish survey instruments and circulate them to the board prior to deployment.

Next steps: district staff will perform a mid‑August analysis of the shortlisted options and return to the board with a comparative report; a public hearing is expected in September where parents and community members can comment before an October decision.