Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Notice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Marshall Credit Union site plan after neighbor concerns about notice, buffers and access
Summary
The Mainland Planning Commission approved SP‑26‑10 for a 4,032 sq ft Marshall Credit Union at 592 Canal Road with a condition requiring a type E buffer along Rosewood Drive. Neighbors raised concerns about a missing posted sign, buffer location, lighting and whether access would be from Canal Road or Rosewood Drive.
Get email alerts on the Public Notice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Mainland Planning Commission on May 5 approved SP‑26‑10, a site plan for a 4,032‑square‑foot Marshall Credit Union at 592 Canal Road, with a condition that the developer provide a type E buffer along Rosewood Drive. The motion passed 6–0.
Christopher Kerry, a senior planner, said the application requests a buffer modification for a highway‑commercial parcel and confirmed that the building will be served by county water and sewer (a packet typo had listed well and septic). Engineer Jake Lemmings, representing Robert Civil Engineering, said full civil plans would be submitted imminently and described the parcel as "0.97 acres."
Neighbors told the commission they had multiple concerns. Sharon Loveven, who said she has lived on Rosewood Drive for 45 years, told commissioners, "there was no sign posted on that property saying about this meeting, the neighbors were not contacted." She asked about buffer type and lighting and said some property line and easement details remain unclear. Wayne Loving questioned whether the site's ingress and egress would be from Canal Road or Rosewood Drive; staff and the applicant said county engineering required access from Rosewood for safety reasons and that the developer cannot connect to Canal Road for this project.
"We are not allowed to connect to Canal Road. That's our only access point," said Jake Lemmings in response to resident concerns about safety and access. Staff also noted that when development adjacent to residential zoning occurs in the future there are standard buffer requirements, but that this parcel currently abuts highway‑commercial property so some buffer obligations differ.
Commissioners voted to approve the site plan with the explicit condition that a type E buffer be required along the frontage of Rosewood Drive. The decision allows the applicant to proceed with civil plan submittal and permitting under Glynn County procedures; staff said a traffic trip generator report had been requested and would be submitted with the civil plans.

