Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Renewal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rocklin Unified approves Maria Monasuri renewal for five years, offers conditional upgrade if state reverses ruling
Summary
After a lengthy public hearing and debate, the Rocklin Unified Board approved a five-year renewal for Maria Monasuri Charter Academy and amended the motion so the district will treat the petition as a seven-year renewal automatically if the California Department of Education revises its performance classification. Supporters said a recent CDE interpretation created a technical exclusion that should not penalize the school.
The Rocklin Unified Board of Trustees voted unanimously to renew the Maria Monasuri Charter Academy petition for a five-year term (July 1, 2026–June 30, 2031) and amended the approval so that if the California Department of Education later reclassifies the school as high performing the district will apply the longer seven-year term without requiring the charter to resubmit paperwork.
Supporters of Maria Monasuri argued the school meets the statutory criteria for a longer renewal but was affected by a technical change in CDE’s January 2026 interpretation that excluded one special-education student who had an opt-out of state testing. “Let me ask you, is five of eight really greater than six of six?” Adrien Garcia, assistant director at Maria Monasuri, told trustees, criticizing the way the state applied subgroup-count rules and arguing the school’s qualifying subgroup data “exceeds corresponding state levels six out of six times.”
Why it matters: A seven-year high-performing renewal can affect eligibility for state and federal grants and expansion or replication funding; speakers said one such grant could be worth approximately $1 million to the school. Petition backers — including representatives from the school, the California Charter School Association and experienced charter advocates — said the CDE’s midyear administrative change produced an unfair technicality and urged the board to grant the full seven years.
Board counsel and staff described a narrower legal path. Superintendent Stock and district legal advisors told trustees the district’s findings of fact support renewal, but staff recommended a five-year term because the district is not required to resolve the disputed statewide performance designation. “We do end up recommending a five‑year renewal because there was no question the petition deserved to be renewed,” Superintendent Stock said, adding the district would welcome an amended petition if the CDE changes its interpretation.
Public comment and related development concerns: Dozens of supporters and community members spoke during the public hearing. Several speakers also raised an unrelated but locally urgent land-use concern: a proposed high-density housing project adjacent to a parcel co-owned by MMCA and Rocklin Unified. Laura Crouch, a long-time MMCA teacher, told the board the project’s geotechnical and air-quality analyses rely on general-plan assumptions rather than site-specific testing and warned of soil and particulate risks near school play areas. “The soil here is a mix of highly expansive clay-rich decomposed granite that swells when wet and shrinks when dry,” Crouch said, urging the district to collaborate with MMCA before city approvals proceed.
What the board decided: Trustee Tiffany Satov moved, and Trustee Derek Counter seconded, a motion to approve the five-year renewal with the conditional automatic upgrade to seven years should the CDE revise MMCA’s statewide classification. The motion passed on a unanimous roll-call vote.
What’s next: Staff said the district would accept written CDE documentation of any classification change and would consider an amended petition if presented. The board and MMCA also highlighted a May 28 town hall where community members can ask questions about the renewal, facilities and related issues.
