Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Butternut Ridge residents urge North Olmsted council to block proposed rezoning
Summary
Dozens of Butternut Ridge residents told the North Olmsted City Council they oppose a proposed rezoning and development that they say would destroy the street's historic character and increase traffic and flooding risks; councilmembers said no formal rezoning application has been presented to them yet.
Dozens of residents of Butternut Ridge packed the podium at the North Olmsted City Council meeting on Nov. 5 to urge the council to halt any rezoning that would allow a cluster-home development in the city's historic district.
Many speakers described longstanding safety and preservation concerns tied to the narrow, two-lane street and pressed the council to keep the area zoned for single-family homes. "We should not have to be here," said Robert Sharp, who identified himself as a North Olmsted resident at 25407 Butternut Ridge Road, recounting multiple traffic-related incidents that he said damaged his property and threatened safety. "We are collecting petition signatures showing opposition to the project," Sharp said.
Why it matters: Speakers said the Butternut Ridge Historic District contains homes dating to the 19th century and represents a unique streetscape that residents want preserved. Several described the proposal as inconsistent with the city's recently adopted 2025 Master Plan and warned that rezoning one parcel would set a precedent allowing incremental conversion of single-family lots into higher-density development.
Several residents offered specifics. Tony Sapienza (25760 Butternut Ridge Road) said peak-traffic estimates presented by proponents undercount service and construction trips and warned that rezoning "is absolutely nuts" for a mature neighborhood without plans for road widening or additional sidewalks. Priscilla Sprano-Wiles (25746 Butternut Ridge Road) traced the street's history to early settlers and emphasized the cultural value of keeping the historic houses intact.
Tammy Swaney (25769 Butternut Ridge Road) asked whether councilmembers had been briefed about private talks between the Mayor and the developer. Councilman Scarl responded that Council had "not been made aware of this project yet" in a formal sense, saying he and colleagues had not seen an official submittal to Council.
Other speakers raised infrastructure concerns: Elaine Freed (27615 Butternut Ridge) said Butternut Ridge already serves as a shortcut for heavy vehicles and that the area has localized flooding; Margaret Corrigan (5930 Decker Road) warned more homes would remove mature trees and worsen drainage. Retired planning director Bob Perry (27150 Butternut Ridge Road) and former city planner Jim Wozniak (26487 Butternut Ridge Road) both urged the council to direct higher-density development toward commercial arterials, not a historic single-family street.
What the council did: The council did not vote on any rezoning tonight. The public comment period is advisory; no formal rezoning application or action was recorded during the meeting. Council members acknowledged the comments and will consider them as the process moves forward.
Next steps: Residents said they will submit petitions and detailed reports to the city, including comparisons to the city's historic district design guidelines and the Master Plan. Council took no formal action on rezoning during the Nov. 5 meeting.
