Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident alleges neighbor harassment and Wi-Fi interference; another resident urges smoke/CO detector inspections
Summary
During public comment, Don Primosch alleged ongoing harassment by neighbors at a nearby address, including property trespass and interference with his home Wi-Fi; Jeff Sturgeon urged the city to consider a program to install and inspect smoke and carbon monoxide detectors in homes being sold and asked about highway signage plans.
Two residents addressed the council during the public-comment period on Sept. 16.
Don (Donald) Primosch of 6064 Stafford Drive told the council he has repeatedly reported problems with neighbors at 6078 Stafford over about 10 years, saying they "continue to play across my property, hit my house, hit my front of my house, kick balls into my car." He said he had made 25 trips to the police station and submitted photos and reports to city staff but felt the response had been inadequate. Primosch also alleged electronic interference with his home internet, saying devices had "jammed" his Wi-Fi on multiple occasions and that several days of surveillance footage were blacked out. He said he planned to submit photographs to the clerk and to federal agencies and the FCC.
When asked by Council President Brossard to submit materials to the clerk, Primosch provided his address for the record and the council accepted the offer to review his photos.
Jeff Sturgeon of 3092 West 231 said he would like the city to consider a program, similar to one in Willoughby, to confirm working smoke and carbon-monoxide detectors in houses that are on the market; he suggested charging a modest fee for the inspection and using proceeds for fire-prevention work. Sturgeon also asked the administration whether the 'North Olmsted' letter signs near Route 480 would be moved or enlarged; Mayor Dailey Jones said the administration is coordinating with ODOT and will keep Council informed.
The council did not debate or act on either public comment during the meeting; both comments were recorded as public testimony to be considered by staff and council as appropriate.
