Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Performance Metrics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee presses for standardized monthly department reports to improve oversight
Summary
Marquette County committee members sought standardized monthly reports across departments — using EMS as a model — to surface trends on response times, staffing and costs, aid budgeting and help incoming board members. They asked staff to develop a template for discussion at the county board.
Marquette County Judicial & Public Safety Committee members on April 7 urged county departments to provide standardized monthly reports that highlight key metrics such as response times, call volumes, staffing vacancies and major expenditures to support oversight and budgeting.
Committee members said Rob’s EMS report — which includes call-volume data, response-time breakdowns and program metrics — provides a template. Chuck, a county supervisor, praised that level of detail, saying, "Rob is doing an an excellent job in getting all of that to us," and argued that regular, comparable data would help new board members get up to speed after elections.
Members framed the change as a continuity and transparency measure tied to the county’s five-year strategic plan. They discussed the potential value of a five-year look-back to spot trends and evaluate investments such as the county’s asphalt plant and fleet-management decisions, and weighed monthly versus quarterly reporting given staff time constraints. Gary and Ken cautioned that more frequent reporting would increase staff work and suggested a phased approach or quarterly frequency for some departments.
The discussion covered practical questions departments would need to answer — for example, how response times are measured (the committee clarified on-scene time runs from patient contact to ambulance departure) — and who would present detailed program information (members suggested department managers present specific items, such as jail operations or treatment-court outcomes, when substantive discussion is required).
Committee members asked county administration to consult department heads and return with a proposed template and list of essential metrics for each department so the county board can consider a standard approach after reorganization.
The committee did not adopt a formal policy at the meeting; members asked staff to prepare proposals and bring them back for further review.
