Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesa council approves consent agenda, bonds and rezoning items
Summary
The Mesa City Council approved its consent agenda on April 6 including multi-year contracts, property sales, general obligation bonds (series 2026), utility refunding obligations and a rezoning case; several items pulled for public comment were also approved.
Mesa City Council on April 6 approved a multi-item consent agenda that included contracts, property-sale resolutions, bond issuances and a rezoning case, and it approved individual items that had been pulled for discussion.
City staff presented the consent agenda and listed key items: liquor-license actions for Guadalupe on Main; a three-year contract with two-year renewal options for welding certification and inspection services for the Energy Resources Department; a three-year contract (plus two-year renewals) for street-light parts and electrical supplies for Transportation; a resolution authorizing sale of city-owned property at 8130 East Redbird; resolutions authorizing issuance and sale of general obligation bonds (series 2026) and various utility systems revenue refunding and obligation series 2026; and authorization for the city manager to contract for an electric power supplier via auction.
Mr. Christopher read the items into the record and the council voted to approve the consent agenda. The council also approved several items that had been pulled earlier in the meeting after brief public comments, including:
- Item 4C (off-consent approval) — approved after brief public comment. - Item 4D (Air Park and Whitman Park playground renovation) — approved. - Item 5A (setting a public hearing date to review proposed annual assessments for Mesa Town Center) — approved. - Item 6A (rezoning Real Salado, a 3.1-acre site northwest of West Real Salado Parkway and North Cubs Way) — approved. - Item 7B (RMCD Dance Studio, southeast corner East Warner Road and South Mountain Road) — approved.
Council members cast votes on each motion; the motions passed. No contested roll-call vote tallies for individual council members were recorded in the transcript, and no further council direction or amendments were noted during the meeting.
