Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consumer Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vendor pitches voluntary HomeServe plumbing protection program; no city funds required
Summary
HomeServe presented a voluntary protection plan for external water and sewer lines and in‑home plumbing. Company representatives said the program requires no public funds, uses direct‑mail marketing with city logo approval, and could return a 10% marketing royalty to the city from participating residents.
Leon Valley — A vendor presentation to the City Council on April 7 introduced a voluntary homeowner protection program that would insure external water lines, external sewer lines and in‑home plumbing for participating residents.
Emily Zeffery Zephyrini, representing HomeServe’s Service Line program, said the product is optional for homeowners, requires no city budget or public funds to implement, and that HomeServe handles marketing, billing and claims administration. She said the program partners with local contractors and claims to vet and use only licensed local firms for repairs, and that customers call HomeServe’s U.S. call centers 24/7 for service.
Cost examples provided to council were $6.99 per month for external water‑line coverage, $7.99 per month for external sewer coverage and $20.99 per month for in‑home plumbing protection; the company representative said pricing varies but these are representative figures. HomeServe said the external coverages pay up to $12,000 per incident and carry no deductibles or annual limits for covered incidents.
On marketing and city involvement, Zeffery said HomeServe seeks permission to use the city logo on the outer envelope of direct‑mail campaigns (three campaigns maximum per year) and requests city review and approval of marketing materials before mailing. The company emphasized there is no door‑to‑door or telemarketing component. She said the firm offers a marketing royalty of 10% of revenue generated by enrollments to participating municipalities but that participation is optional.
Council questions focused on contractor availability in small jurisdictions, the need for clear language that the city is not liable or affiliated with the program, expected revenue returns for peer cities, and whether the vendor would request the city’s mailing list. The vendor said the city may provide address data if it chooses but HomeServe can also purchase third‑party mailing lists.
Council did not approve agreement language on April 7; members asked staff to review sample contracts, vendor references and local partner lists and to return with more detailed financial examples and contract terms if the council wishes to pursue a marketing agreement.
What happens next: Staff will review the sample agreement and provide additional information (local contractor lists, sample royalties realized in comparable municipalities, and draft marketing materials) before the council considers a formal marketing agreement.
