Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Update Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission discusses code update process and seeks clearer public assurances
Summary
At its Feb. 12 meeting, the Emigration Canyon Planning Commission heard a staff speaker urge editorial housekeeping and a transparency spreadsheet for ordinance updates; commissioners moved to reorder business and adjourned after the discussion.
The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission met Feb. 12, 2026, and discussed procedures for updating land-use code documents, with a staff member urging clearer editorial controls and a spreadsheet to reassure the public. The meeting convened at 8:48 a.m. and adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
Claire Gillmor asked the commission to "do housekeeping in reformatting and editorial," and said supervisors from each public body should "assure the public that nothing nefarious related to ordinance updates is going on without going through the process." She proposed adding a developed spreadsheet to the process "to quail [quell] concern," according to the meeting summary. The transcript records Commissioner Dale Berreth moving to take items out of order and move to a closed session, with Commissioner Andrew Wallace seconding the motion.
The agenda listed "Code Update Process" as Item 1. Gillmor told the commission that formatting and editorial housekeeping steps should be formalized so the public can verify that ordinance updates follow required procedures. The commission then proceeded to discuss the item; Commissioner Tim Harpst moved to adjourn and Commissioner Wallace seconded. The minutes state the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
Meeting documentation notes the minutes were approved on May 14, 2026, and staff reports referenced in the meeting are available on the State website or from Planning & Development Services. The meeting summary lists planning staff and commissioners in attendance and records one member of the public present.
The commission did not record roll-call vote tallies in the minutes for the motions noted. The discussion centered on internal process controls rather than specific code language or ordinance amendments; no formal ordinance adoption or amendment vote is recorded in the meeting summary. The staff were asked to formalize editorial and procedural steps that would provide transparent documentation of changes to code updates.
