Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Discipline Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenter urges Proviso 209 board to exhaust alternatives before suspensions, citing 'freshman 9' and Senate Bill 100

Proviso Township High School District 209 Board of Education · May 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At public comment a resident urged the board to avoid relying on suspensions after describing a prior case called the 'freshman 9' and referenced Senate Bill 100, saying the district should exhaust alternatives before removing students from school.

A public commenter told the Proviso Township High School District 209 board on May 12 that prior disciplinary handling known in the record as the "freshman 9" led to nine students—described in the comment as predominantly African American males—being pushed toward expulsion. The commenter urged board members to follow Illinois' Senate Bill 100 guidance and exhaust alternatives before removing students from school, saying, "we cannot suspend our way out of it."

Why it matters: The commenter framed the issue as both an equity and practical concern—arguing that suspensions and expulsions can produce repeated incidents rather than solve underlying problems. The statement cites a specific legislative standard (Senate Bill 100) that the commenter said requires exhausting other avenues before out-of-school removals.

What was said: The commenter recalled the earlier incident and asked board members to consider what led students to behave as they did and what adults could do differently, emphasizing concern for student safety and learning. The comment included the assertion that staff and administrators should pursue restorative or alternative interventions before suspension.

Board response and outcome: The meeting record shows the public comment was heard during the public comment portion of the agenda. No formal board action on district discipline policy or an immediate agenda item responding to the comment was recorded during this meeting; the transcript records the comment and the board acknowledged it.

Record limitations: The transcript does not provide identifiable personal information for the commenter beyond their remarks, and several names and terms in the record are garbled. The transcript references "Senate Bill 100" as stated by the commenter; the board did not debate or take a vote on discipline policy at this meeting.