Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Peddlers Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lennox council tables peddlers-permit ordinance that would explicitly exempt food trucks
Summary
The Lennox City Council debated Ordinance No. 669, which would clarify peddlers-permit rules and explicitly exempt food trucks while removing sensitive application items; council members raised event-vendor and fee-waiver questions and voted to table the ordinance for revision.
Mayor Danny Bergen called the meeting to order and the council took up Ordinance No. 669, a proposed change to the city's peddlers-permit rules intended to "make it perfectly clear" that food trucks are exempt from current peddlers-permit requirements.
Nate, a city staff member who introduced the measure, said, "What we're trying to do here is exempt food trucks from the existing regulations for a Peddler's Permit," and that the draft would also remove application items such as date of birth and Social Security numbers that staff said were unnecessary for enforcement.
The ordinance prompted questions from multiple council members about vendors at special events. One council member asked whether organizers of community events such as the Fourth of July and Park Drive After 5 would still be able to require booth vendors to obtain permits; Nate answered that the city would not independently require those vendors to obtain a peddlers permit if the host organization already manages booth registration, but that host organizations could continue to require compliance as a condition of participation.
Council members also discussed administrative implementation: Nate recommended removing fee amounts from the ordinance and setting peddlers fees in a separate fee resolution so the council would not need to read the ordinance again to change fees. A council member suggested requiring visible credentials and badges for door-to-door sellers; Nate said staff is working on lanyard-style badges showing business name and permit number.
Officials flagged the potential for transient merchants to create higher volumes and suggested keeping options such as higher fees or surety bonds available if problems arise, though most said higher fees are not necessary at this time.
After discussion and direction for staff to clarify language distinguishing door-to-door solicitation from temporary event vendors and to remove fee text, the council moved and voted to table Ordinance No. 669 so staff can revise the draft and return it to a future meeting. The motion to table carried by voice vote; the ordinance will be considered again after the revisions are prepared.
Next steps: staff will revise the ordinance to clarify exemptions and to remove fee language, produce recommended fee-resolution language if needed, and return the ordinance for later consideration by the council.
