Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cemetery Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Smithfield council signals higher nonresident cemetery fee, plans to open new sections

Smithfield City Council · April 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reached consensus April 8 to not require a death before purchase, to open Sections D-1 (93 full-sized plots) and D-2 (cremation) and to raise the nonresident plot price to $3,500; staff will return formal ordinance/resolution language in May.

City staff presented a revised cemetery map and proposed fee changes at the Smithfield City Council meeting on April 8, recommending immediate opening of Sections D-1 and D-2 and proposing a buyback program for unused plots.

City Manager Justin Lewis said the revised map identifies Sections D-1 (93 full-sized burial plots) and D-2 (designated for cremations) and recommended opening those areas next, noting Smithfield has limited remaining cemetery space. Staff also proposed a plot buyback option offering $400 or the original purchase price with proof of purchase.

Councilmembers discussed residency rules and enforceability. Several members said they want to preserve plots for residents and discourage speculative purchases; Councilmember Todd Orme said requiring a death before purchase would impose an additional burden on families. By consensus the council did not adopt a death-before-purchase requirement and directed staff to return formal fee and opening language in May, with a proposed increase to $3,500 for nonresident plot purchases to preserve availability for city residents.

Mr. Lewis noted state law allows reclamation of unused plots after a legal process of roughly 60 years but that the procedure is lengthy and had produced minimal results when Smithfield pursued it about a decade ago. No formal resolution vote was recorded at the April 8 meeting; staff will present the finalized language and any formal action for council consideration at a future meeting.