Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board defers WASDA-aligned policy updates after members raise concerns about student release and discipline redline
Summary
Board members asked staff to produce a focused redline comparing WASDA model edits with the district's previously adopted customizations and to run legal review on student-release and law-enforcement language before any policy adoption.
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the same workshop the South Whidbey School District board began a review of student policies updated to align with WASDA model language and raised substantive procedural and legal questions that led the board to defer final action.
Dr. Clifford presented updated student policies described as WASDA-aligned. A board member raised a procedural concern about the removal of 'designee' language in the student-release procedure, asking whether that change would create extra work for principals and interfere with routine front-office excusals. "Is that going to add unnecessary work to principals?" the board member asked; principals replied that context matters and urged staff to clarify procedure and legal alignment.
Members also flagged a reference to releasing students to law enforcement. One director noted the district's policy 4310 does not currently mention law-enforcement release and suggested staff verify RCW references and cross-references to district policy.
A contentious point centered on discipline-policy redlines. A board member (speaker 6) said the uploaded redline appeared to undo local customizations the board had previously adopted, including a local requirement to report disaggregated discipline data. "The board made some pretty significant customizations to this policy a couple years ago. And so this red line we're looking at right now undoes all of them," the member said. Other board members asked staff to prepare a separate redline that (a) inserts WASDA updates only and (b) shows where the board’s prior custom language differs.
Board members asked for legal review where the model wording conflicts with district customizations and for staff to ensure policy and procedure documents align operationally (for example, who may sign students out when a parent delegates a designee). The board agreed to either bring the clarified redline to the upcoming business meeting if staff capacity allows or to schedule it for a future workshop.
No votes were taken; the board directed staff to return with: a redline separating WASDA edits from local customizations, confirmation from district legal counsel on law-enforcement and release language, and proposed wording that preserves any lawful local reporting commitments the board had previously adopted.

