Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recycling And Waste Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears increases to tipping fees and recycling costs as contractors raise prices
Summary
Officials reported a $3 per-ton tipping fee increase to $148, contractor increases for hauling and environmental services, a $67,000 contingency for recycled tonnage growth, and a rebid of the hazardous-waste shipper showing a 13.8% increase; staff said commodity price declines and contractor scope changes drive revenue uncertainty.
Solid waste and recycling operations drew detailed scrutiny as managers outlined cost pressures, contract increases and an equipment reserve proposal during the finance committee work session.
The borough's solid waste manager told the committee the regular tipping fee will increase from $145 to $148 per ton (a 2.1% CPI adjustment); outside-borough customers will be charged double that rate. The manager also said Alaska Waste's hauling contract includes a requested 2.1% increase and the disposal operation is budgeting for higher tipping fee volumes (staff forecast about 50,000 tons to transfer sites).
Recycling and hazardous waste: central recycling facility (CRF) operators may request an additional $67,000 if throughput exceeds 1,000 tons to fund two extra staff positions to handle increased volume. Solid waste staff warned commodity markets have depressed CRF revenue; the budget records roughly $60,000 projected commodity sales against higher operating costs, producing a structural subsidy from the disposal fund. The hazardous-waste shipping contract (Republic Services) came in as the only responsive bidder during rebid and returned a 13.8% increase, an added $42,265 to that line.
Landfill operational costs: staff reported a $126,200 contract award for gravel cover (a DEC requirement) and a roughly $190,000 total increase in environmental services driven by added scope, sample needs and lab cost inflation. Managers said they prefer conservative tonnage and cost estimates to avoid mid-year supplemental requests.
What assembly members asked: Members requested past-year averages and asked how the new central recycling facility and an on-site move would affect lease and utility lines. Staff said moving the CRF to landfill property should reduce lease costs (line item $123,930) while increasing utilities for larger on-site space; they also agreed to provide a historical five-year grant and subsidy lookback to show trends and savings potential.
Next steps: Staff will include these increases in the FY27 recommended budget and will provide additional backup (historical trends, vendor bid details and projected revenues) as assembly members requested. No final votes were taken during the session.
