Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Midland board hears facility-assessment timeline and pre-bond schedule; steering committee will help shape scope
Summary
Facilities consultant Stephen told the board the district will finish building assessments in early Q1, Clark Construction will estimate costs, and the board will need to approve bond scope by May to meet mid-June Treasury PQ deadlines and an August ballot-language deadline; a broad steering committee will guide scope development.
The Midland Public Schools board received a detailed update on facility assessments and a pre-bond timeline on Dec. 15.
Stephen, the district's facilities representative working with GMBB and other consultants, said building assessments will be completed in January, Clark Construction will provide cost estimates that same month, and educational assessments will be finalized in mid-January. The district plans to convene a broadly representative steering committee to vet and help finalize the bond scope.
Key calendar items Stephen outlined: the board should vote on a proposed bond scope at the May meeting so the district can finalize a PQ application and meet a mid-June meeting with the state Treasury; the board would then approve ballot language in August and conduct public outreach ahead of a possible November bond election. Stephen emphasized that the board can pause or change course at any point if members decide not to proceed.
He explained facility-assessment deliverables will identify near-term (0-3 years), mid-term (5-10 years) and long-term needs and that site/civil work may be delayed by snow. Stephen used plain-language analogies (buildings' "guts" and "skeletal system") to clarify technical needs for nontechnical audiences.
Board members asked about the timeline for assessment deliverables; Stephen said the facility assessment is expected to be complete early Q1. Trustees reiterated they will form and rely on a steering committee to develop a bond scope with community buy-in and reminded the public that the board can elect not to proceed if conditions change.
Public comment during the meeting urged greater transparency on student headcount data (see separate item), which trustees said would be among considerations as planning proceeds.
