Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Gorton Building topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School committee asks administration for cost–benefit analysis of Gorton building
Summary
The Warwick School Committee unanimously voted March 11 to ask the administration to evaluate relocating central offices and to produce a cost–benefit analysis for continuing to maintain the Gorton building, citing roof, septic and code-upgrade costs and deed restrictions.
The Warwick School Committee on March 11 adopted a resolution directing the administration to prepare a cost–benefit analysis of the Gorton building and to study alternatives, including leasing centrally located office space.
The mover described structural issues — including a needed new roof and the building’s septic system, which raises long-term maintenance costs — and said the district should evaluate whether leasing could reduce upkeep expenses. Committee members asked administration to consider deed restrictions that might limit disposal options and to identify logistical costs tied to moving administrative storage and services.
Mr Testa, a committee member, said the goal was to initiate an evaluation and not to decide immediate disposition. “I’m just asking that the administration do an evaluation, not pull the trigger on anything until they evaluate,” he said. Supporters said a professional appraisal and a complete accounting of running costs would be appropriate.
The resolution passed; the administration will return with figures and a recommendation for the committee to review. Committee members suggested professional assistance will likely be required to assess relocation and the true cost of maintaining Gorton.
