Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Building topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission counsels owners of 225 East 75 South: smaller rock building may remain for nonresidential use; inspection and letter set for July 1
Summary
Owners of the property at 225 East 75 South told the Rockville Planning Commission they will move in by July 1; the commission confirmed the small rock building may not be used as a residence unless joined, will require the water to be disconnected and will provide a follow‑up letter and periodic inspections.
At a presentation on 225 East 75 South, property owners (identified in the discussion as Dan and Camille) told the commission they had received the town’s letter about a preexisting second structure on their parcel and said they plan to move to Rockville around July 1.
Town staff and commissioners reviewed Rockville’s rule allowing only one livable dwelling per parcel unless structures are joined. The commission advised that the small rock building on the property can remain as a preexisting nonconforming structure but cannot be used for sleeping quarters or other habitable purposes if water service is connected. A commissioner recalled historical minutes noting prior owners and past code enforcement related to a similar situation.
Dan said the property has been rented historically and that the couple intends to move in after their son finishes school. Commissioners and staff discussed evidence that the water to the smaller rock building had been disconnected previously; the town’s remedy is to ensure the water remains shut off to that structure if it is to remain nonresidential. Staff offered to inspect the disconnection in person with the owner’s permission and to provide a new letter documenting the commission’s guidance.
Commissioners also discussed permitted alternative uses — for example, an office or studio — provided water is outside the building (a water bib outside was discussed as acceptable). The owners asked that the town extend time to make their changes while they arrange to move; staff and the commission agreed to prepare a follow‑up letter and to allow an occupancy window tied to compliance steps, with a target date of July 1 for the owners to complete the initial steps and allow inspection.
The commission indicated it may add periodic inspections for properties with allowed secondary structures that present past compliance issues. The exchange closed with staff offering to produce a written summary of what the owners must complete and to schedule an inspection time.
