Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Concepts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers present two multifamily concept plans; commissioners raise traffic, design and accessibility concerns
Summary
Pelton Builders proposed a two‑phase project at 1911 Janesville Avenue with up to 112 units; a separate downtown concept at 311 South Main (Browns Court) would create compact, mixed‑use units. Commissioners offered feedback on traffic, access, materials, ADA footprints and bicycle storage; both concepts will require additional zoning or approvals.
Get email alerts on the Housing Concepts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two separate concept plans for multifamily housing were presented to the Fort Atkinson Plan Commission on May 12, and commissioners used the session to offer early feedback before formal applications are filed.
Pelton Builders presented a two‑phase concept for 1911 Janesville Avenue that Drager said could total as many as 112 units across multiple 16‑unit garden‑style buildings. The site is currently zoned rural holding; Drager said a zoning map amendment, certified survey map and later site‑plan and conditional‑use or planned unit development approvals would be required. Commissioners flagged concerns about the main entrance’s proximity to the Commerce Parkway intersection, internal parking/drive aisles, and opportunities to connect the site to the Glacial River Trail.
A second concept, Browns Court at 311 South Main, would be a downtown‑peripheral mixed‑use redevelopment with three buildings and internal parking (about 18 spaces). Staff described compact, stacked units with a required commercial element; commissioners expressed a design preference for stronger street‑facing massing and different exterior materials to avoid a “motel” appearance. Commissioners also asked about how ADA unit footprint requirements might affect building layout and noted that bicycle storage is currently not required by city code but would benefit residents.
Why it matters: Both concepts add to a wave of local proposals responding to a need for more housing options in Fort Atkinson. Early commissioner feedback focuses on circulation, connectivity to nearby trails and pedestrian orientation — issues that will shape later site‑plan submittals.
What’s next: Both projects, if pursued, will return for zoning map amendments and site‑plan review; technical studies (traffic, stormwater, ADA compliance) will be required during the formal review process.

