Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reston board debates political‑sign timing and definitions ahead of elections
Summary
Directors debated whether Reston should change the rule that limits election signage to 30 days before an election, with some urging expansion to 60 days and calls for clearer definitions to distinguish election signs from non‑election issue messages.
The association’s board and committees spent a portion of the meeting wrestling with how to define and regulate political and issue signage. One director said the current guideline — which allows political signs beginning 30 days before an election — may be too short and suggested extending the window: "I would strongly recommend that and change that to 60 days before an election," a board member said.
Why it matters: Members raised two distinct concerns: timing (when election signs may be installed) and scope (how to treat non‑election issue signs such as neighborhood 'save the golf course' messages). Staff warned that unclear definitions open the door to differing interpretations of what constitutes a political sign — for example, whether statements like 'We love all people' count as political.
Discussion and constraints: Directors noted First Amendment considerations for election speech and observed that some clusters rarely complain about issue signs while others do. Staff recommended defining 'political campaign sign' and adjusting the calendar and removal period (one director suggested a 10‑day post‑election removal requirement). The board asked staff to propose draft wording that distinguishes election campaign signs from other types of displays and to clarify enforcement triggers.
Next steps: Staff will return with suggested definitions and timeline options for how long signs may remain post‑election; no rule change was adopted at the meeting.
