Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winona County HHS briefs commissioners on waivers, rising out-of-home placement costs
Summary
Human Services staff told the board that Medicaid waivers let officials tailor services for people with disabilities and that mandated out-of-home placements for children remain costly and variable; commissioners asked for clearer eligibility thresholds, wait-list counts and upstream investments to reduce expensive placements.
Human Services staff opened the session with a primer on managed-care terminology and Medicaid waivers, explaining that waivers remove some plan limits so people with special needs—such as people with autism—can access individualized services not otherwise provided under standard managed-care rules.
The presenter said waivers “waive all or some of the limitations from your plan in order to meet your needs better,” and noted that waiver recipients often receive more intensive services tailored to their needs, from sensory supports to around-the-clock care.
County staff then highlighted the county’s obligations for out-of-home placements for children: county government is responsible for mandated placements for eligible children and that those placements can be expensive. The presentation cited the most recent published data point of 117 children in out-of-home care (noting that the figure changes over time) and warned that a single high-need placement can cost in excess of half a million dollars per year.
Commissioners pressed for operational clarity: one commissioner asked for the eligibility threshold for Medical Assistance and whether eligibility is income- or asset-based; staff said eligibility depends on household size, income and some asset tests. Commissioners also asked whether the county keeps a current count of children with move-in dates who have assessment priority; staff said the most recent, published data were 2023 figures and that counts fluctuate.
Several commissioners urged the county to invest earlier in community-based services—respite, kinship supports and other upstream interventions—to reduce higher-cost downstream placements. Staff and commissioners discussed using the county’s comparative report on out-of-home placements to identify counties with lower placement rates and to replicate promising practices.
The presentation noted a program success: adding a case aide and changing internal processes reduced out-of-home placement spending by more than $400,000 in one example, illustrating how targeted staffing and upstream work can produce savings and better outcomes for children.
The county’s Human Services director asked commissioners to digest the briefing and return with questions; staff said they will prepare flowchart-style visuals and follow-up materials to make eligibility rules, wait-list priorities and funding distinctions clearer to the board.
