Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Road Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners move on petition to vacate parts of Redstone and Waterfront drives and consider supplemental engineering agreement for First Street
Summary
At a Feb. 24 meeting, Bonneville County commissioners introduced a motion to accept findings for a petition to vacate portions of Redstone Drive and Waterfront Drive and took up a supplemental agreement to change First Street drawings from three lanes to five lanes; both motions were seconded, but a formal vote is not recorded in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Road Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A commissioner moved to accept findings of fact and conclusions related to a petition to vacate portions of Redstone Drive and Waterfront Drive, a roadway area described as south of 65th South and just west of the Yellowstone Highway near a gravel/mining operation. The motion was seconded, and the exchange on the floor was brief; the transcript records the motion and a second but does not record a roll-call or final vote.
The meeting also considered a supplemental agreement with Civil Science to revise engineered drawings on First Street — changing plans from three lanes to five lanes for the segment from Amon Road to 4050s. A commissioner said, “I'll make a motion to accept a supplemental agreement on street and 45th.” That motion was seconded; staff said they would route the signed final copy through IT.
Why it matters: the street vacation petition could change public right-of-way control adjacent to a gravel/mining operation, and the supplemental engineering agreement would alter planned lane configuration on First Street, with potential budget and construction implications.
Details from the meeting: a speaker described the vacation petition as affecting sections "south of 65th South um just to the west … west of the Yellowstone Highway" near a gravel operation. The supplemental agreement amount was stated in the transcript as "$125,51." Staff said they would obtain the signed final copy after routing it through IT.
Attendees noted these were the only formal action items called out on the agenda during the meeting. The transcript does not record a formal vote tally or the final outcome for either motion.

